Quality scorecards
Quality scorecards define the criteria used to evaluate each audit in a campaign. Without a configured scorecard, the campaign cannot be used for consistent audits or quality result calculation.
What a quality scorecard is
A quality scorecard includes:
- Evaluation criteria with yes/no answers.
- An evaluation mode to calculate the final score.
- Criticality settings for sensitive criteria.
- Alert rules in quantitative mode.
- Tag generation parameters associated with the campaign.
Before you start
To create or edit a scorecard you need to:
- Have a campaign created.
- Have administration or supervision permissions over that campaign.
- Define the minimum passing score expected for audits.
If you have not configured a campaign yet, see Campaign management.
If a campaign does not have a configured scorecard yet, AuditorIA can show a warning that auditing is not possible until configuration is completed.
Access scorecards
- Enter the Campaigns module.
- Open the Audits section.
- Select Quality scorecards.
- Choose an existing campaign or create a new scorecard.
Scorecards by channel
Each channel can have its own scorecard. This lets you evaluate calls and chats with criteria suited to each conversation type.
| Channel | Example criterion |
|---|---|
| Calls | Greeting, active listening, call closing |
| Social media | Written tone, resolution, response clarity |
General campaign information
When creating a scorecard, first complete the campaign base data.
| Field | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Campaign ID | Unique campaign identifier | 42 |
| Campaign name | Visible name for the scorecard | Technical support - morning shift |
| Passing score | Minimum threshold to pass an audit | 80 |
| Supervisor emails | Emails that receive reports or alerts | sup1@company.com, sup2@company.com |
Passing score The passing score works as a threshold. If the final score is below that value, the audit is marked as failed.
Tag generation
This step defines how audited calls are tagged automatically.
| Mode | Description |
|---|---|
| Automatic (AI) | The platform generates tags based on call content |
| Manual | A fixed list of tags defined by your team is applied |
| Hybrid | Combines manual tags with automatic generation |
Evaluation mode
The evaluation mode determines how the final audit score is calculated.
AuditorIA offers two modes.
Qualitative
In this mode, each criterion has its own weight. The total sum of weights must be exactly 100.
When to use it
- When some criteria are more important than others.
- When you want certain failures to subtract more points.
- When you need fine control over the final score.
How it is calculated
Initial score = 100
For each unmet criterion:
- If it is critical: score = 0 and audit failed
- If it is not critical: score = score - criterion_weight
If the final score is lower than the passing score:
- audit failed
| Criterion | Weight | Meets | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Problem resolution | 40 | Yes | No deduction |
| Speaking cordiality | 20 | No | -20 |
| Correct wait time | 25 | Yes | No deduction |
| Customer data verified | 15 | No | -15 |
| Total | 100 | Final score = 65 |
With passing_score = 80, the audit fails.
Critical criterion in qualitative mode
If a criterion marked as critical is not met, the score automatically becomes 0 and the audit fails without evaluating the rest of the score.
Quantitative
In this mode, all criteria have the same weight. The score is calculated from the proportion of approved criteria over the total.
When to use it
- When every checklist item has the same importance.
- When you want an evaluation that is simple and easy to explain.
- When you prefer a uniform compliance model.
How it is calculated
Score = (approved_criteria / total_criteria) * 100
If the final score is lower than the passing score:
- audit failed
| Criterion | Meets |
|---|---|
| Problem resolution | Yes |
| Speaking cordiality | Yes |
| Correct wait time | No |
| Customer data verified | Yes |
| Closing procedure | No |
Score = (3 / 5) * 100 = 60
With passing_score = 80, the audit fails.
Critical criterion in quantitative mode In this mode, an unmet critical criterion does not automatically fail the audit. Instead, it can trigger email alerts or internal notifications depending on the criterion or campaign configuration.
Criteria configuration
Each criterion represents a question the auditor answers during the evaluation.
Criterion fields
| Field | Description | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Thematic grouping for the criterion | Yes |
| Question | Specific question to evaluate | Yes |
| Description | Guidance to help the auditor | No |
| Score | Criterion weight | Only in qualitative mode |
| Is critical | Defines special behavior when unmet | No |
Alerts for critical criteria in quantitative mode
When the scorecard is in quantitative mode and the criterion is critical, additional settings can appear.
| Field | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Alert emails | Recipients who receive the alert when the criterion fails | quality@company.com, management@company.com |
| In-app notification | Creates an alert inside AuditorIA | Enabled |
| Global emails | Recipients who receive alerts for any unmet critical criterion in the campaign | supervision@company.com |
Use global emails when the same team must always be informed, even if each criterion has its own recipients.
Add and order criteria
- Click Add criterion.
- Complete the criterion card.
- If you use qualitative mode, verify that the total sum is
100. - Reorder criteria if you need to change their visual priority.
- Delete criteria from the trash icon when they no longer apply.
Score sum in qualitative mode
The scorecard cannot be saved if the score sum is not exactly 100. This validation does not apply in quantitative mode because all criteria have the same weight.
Save the scorecard
When you complete the configuration:
- Review the criteria summary.
- Click Save scorecard.
- Wait for the final form validation.
- If everything is correct, the detail view opens.
View scorecard details
The detail view lets you review the full configuration without entering edit mode.
You will usually see:
- Campaign ID and name.
- Passing score.
- Evaluation mode.
- Supervisor emails.
- Tag configuration.
- Full list of criteria and their rules.
Edit an existing scorecard
- Open the scorecard from the list or from the campaign.
- Click Edit.
- Update the necessary fields.
- Save the configuration again.
Changing the evaluation mode in an existing scorecard affects future audits. Audits already recorded keep the result calculated with the previous configuration.
How to choose the right mode
| Situation | Qualitative | Quantitative |
|---|---|---|
| Criteria have different importance | Ideal | Not applicable |
| All criteria have equal weight | Can be excessive | Ideal |
| You need immediate failure for a severe criterion | Yes | No |
| You need alerts without blocking the score | No | Yes |
| You want quick configuration | Requires weights | Simpler |
| You want granular control | Yes | No |
Quick glossary
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Criterion | Evaluation question answered by the auditor |
| Weight | Score assigned to a criterion in qualitative mode |
| Critical criterion | Criterion whose failure creates a special consequence |
| Passing score | Minimum threshold to pass the audit |
| is_audit_failure | Internal indicator for a failed audit |
| alert_emails | Emails that receive alerts for critical criteria |